Strange today that University of Hawaii President M.R.C. Greenwood was silent, after casting a dark cloud over the U.H. Football program yesterday by going public with allegations of point shaving contained in an anonymous letter.
With the police department following her statement saying that after looking into the matter there was not enough information to warrant a criminal investigation, you’d think Greenwood would have said something about the matter, today.
Like what? Well, how about why she felt the allegations from an unknown person who would not identify him or her self should be brought to the public’s attention?
Couldn’t this be the work of a disgruntled gambler, upset the team didn’t cover the spread? Aren’t most anonymous letters thrown in a trash can? What made this one any different? Doesn’t the public deserve to know why these anonymous allegations were treated differently? Just asking.
See the original article at: KHON2 Developing Stories
